Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
In addition, we found no significant differences within the MenC eligible age-cohorts between the total sampled population and the persons for whom a MenCC immunization record was available (data not shown).
Similar(59)
There was no difference in socioeconomic status between the total samples of offspring (N = 65) and controls (N = 81) (see Table 1<\emph>).
We found no influential outliers and no systematic differences between the total sample and the excluded cases.
Differences in demographic and psychological variables between the total sample and the subsample under study were very minor.
The cumulative distribution functions (see material and methods) between the total sample and the three subpopulations differed significantly for six of the eight MSRs (Table 2).
There were no significant differences in characteristics between the development sample and the validation sample by site or between the total samples (all p>0.10).
There were no significant differences between the total sample of parents and our sub-sample of parents, with the exception of gender: the sub-sample included more mothers.
We adjusted for these differences in distribution between the total sample (14% from 18 39 age group) and respondents by giving greater weight to younger respondents.
There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the total sample and the sub-group who received the GHJ injection as part of the MRA procedure (p > 0.05).
Prior to analysis, differences between the total sample and subsample with blood parameters were evaluated using a t-test for numerical data and chi-square test for categorical data.
However, the correlations between the total sample of adolescents and externalizing and total problem behavior are negative and can be considered small to moderate, meaning that studies with small sample sizes tend to have larger effect sizes, which is consistent with publication bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com