Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
Discussions between the three treating physiotherapists and two of the study authors (KOS and MOK) will take place to ensure effective and consistent delivery across sites.
Similar(59)
Eligible patients coming to the outpatient mood disorders clinic for their routine appointments were invited to participate in the study after euthymic status had been confirmed by consensus between the two treating clinicians (YO and RHB or YB).
Analyses were performed to evaluate possible statistical significance between the two treated groups and the control group.
On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the two treated groups: Clinpro group and SEP group (P = 0.05), and Clinpro group and ICON group (P = 0.24).
Subsequently, blood flow increased gradually to a level of 81.2±2.9% (EPC-CM) and 83.7±3.0% (EPC) after five weeks (P = n.s. between the two treated groups; Figure 4A, B).
No statistical difference was found between the two treated groups in any of the pre-therapeutic clinical parameters.
The Fisher exact test was used to compare the morphology of regenerated tissues between the two treated groups of patients (biopsies obtained longer than 18 months after surgery and biopsies obtained within 18 months of surgery).
Tumor volume of group B and C was significantly lower than that of group A (P was 0.029 and 0.001, respectively), however, there was no significant difference in tumor volume between the two treated groups (P = 0.691).
Similar organ and subcellular distribution of both elements were found between the two treated groups, and only statistically significant higher levels of Cu were found in plasma and liver.
No significant differences in the phosphorylation of p38 were observed between the three groups treated with HSA.
Between the three subgroups treated previously with MPH, daily MPH dosage also varied significantly (MANOVA: F 2, 521) = 64.52; P < 0.001), being highest in the MPH-MR group, followed by the MPH-IR >o.d.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com