Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
In other words, the direct mechanical force to seal off appendix was comparable between the three tools.
This strong agreement between the three tools in our view confirms the overall reliability of our results and supports our judgment that the workflow we used in our analysis is also a valid alternative to identify differentially expressed genes.
There was no significant difference (all P values >0.49) between the three tools either with regard to accuracy (BPS, 7 [ 7, 8]; CPOT 8 [ 5– 8], NVPS 7 [ 6– 8]) or usefulness (BPS, 7 [ 5– 8]; CPOT 8 [ 5– 8], NVPS 7 [ 6– 8]).
Similar(57)
We also noted that the overlap between the results of the three tools was relatively low.
The videos show them nimbly switching back and forth between the two tools.
Moreover, a priority list containing the most hazardous compounds identified in agreement between the two tools is drafted.
The paper discusses the differences and similarities between the two tools with regard to their development, the method of conducting the surveys, the results and their implications.
This article identifies harmonies, discrepancies, and relations between the two tools exemplified by the RA principles of the European Commission (EC) and the LCA method, Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP), developed in Denmark, respectively.
We observed that the immediate, successive completion of questionnaires varying in length resulted in no significant difference in appetite markers, with a strong linear relationship between the two tools (r from 0.80 to 0.98, P < 0.01).
The assessment of quality of care differed significantly between the two tools.
There was no notable difference between the two tools (P = 0.21) for the coronal Cobb angle.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com