Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(42)
There were no statistically significant differences in VA (distance or near) between the three subgroups (p > 0.01 for all comparisons).
The differences in mortality between the three subgroups can be partly explained by the severity of acute illness.
The osteometric analysis (BCB, APDMC and APDLC) revealed no significant differences between the three subgroups of subjects (<40, 40 60, >60 years) (Table 3).
The results showed differences between the three subgroups in all three contexts, which suggest several setting-specific guidelines to promote positive outcome.
Level of anxiety did not differ between the three subgroups.
The four parameters were finally compared between the three subgroups categorized by MaxO2 or by MMVC.
Similar(18)
No significant differences were observed between the two subgroups.
There was no difference between the two subgroups of patients.
There was a strongly significant difference of the B-glucose between the two subgroups (p < 0.0001).
Intensity and duration of MO-attacks were not different between the two subgroups.
Survival curves were compared between the two subgroups.
More suggestions(17)
between the three populations
between the three clusters
between the three subsets
between the three subpopulations
between the three subregions
between the three parts
between the three subclasses
between the three ministers
between the three markets
between the three metals
between the three schemes
between the three facilities
between the three conditions
between the three compounds
between the three samples
between the three sets
between the three groups
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com