Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
The HIS user experience varied between the three sample groups.
No evidence was noted for heterogeneity between the three sample sets (P het = 0.99; I = 0).
By extension, 3% of the length of the genome showed disagreement in CN Calls between the three sample runs.
The subtypes of CN-LOH were found to differ in their relative frequency between the three sample groups.
Known group validity analyses conducted via ANOVAs determined that CAT subscale scores differed significantly between the three sample groups (P < .000 for all comparisons).
There was no significant difference between the three sample groups in the percentage of total Lactobacillus after Bonferroni correction (p>0.05; see online supplementary figure S6).
Similar(41)
Furthermore, bacterial composition was very different between the three samples.
After the third step, the results varied significantly between the three samples.
The Bonferroni correction was used to determine the contrast between the three sampled stations.
The mean frequency of headache days was significantly different between the three samples (Table 5).
Figure 4 shows that there was no obvious difference in transition temperature between the three samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com