Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(55)
We detected no differences between the three genotypes 1 or 2 h after stimulation.
Both IL-2 and IL-7 increased pSTAT5 (all p < 0.001) without perceptible differences between the three genotypes (Fig. 3b).
There were no statistically significant differences between the three genotypes with regards to gender, age or clinical characteristics (calculations not shown).
Codon use differs between the three genotypes and appears to be driven by mutation rather than selection.
The first day when the normal startle responses were observed was used for comparison between the three genotypes.
In this case however, we did not observe any significant differences between the three genotypes (Table S1).
Similar(5)
In comparisons between the three genotyping platforms, Affy 6.0 generated the most-accurate HLA-allele predictions.
However, there were no significant differences in the distribution of Caucasians/non-Caucasians Caucasians/non-Caucasianse groups.
Concerning lipid, laboratory and anthropometric parameters, no significant differences were found between the three genotype subgroups.
We obtained the expected results from 32 sets of primers between the two genotypes.
There was no significant difference seen in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values between the two genotypes.
More suggestions(22)
between the three genotyping
between the four genotypes
between the three ministers
between the three markets
between the three metals
between the three schemes
between the three facilities
between the three tins
between the three auctions
between the three conditions
between the three compounds
between the three words
between the three samples
between the three spinners
between the three sets
between the three groups
between the three supplements
between the three novels
between the three levels
between the three protocols
between the three parties
between the three services
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com