There is one key difference between the two examples considered above.
One interesting difference between the two examples is that the first appeals to a geometrical theorem whereas the second appeals to an arithmetical theorem.
Nevertheless, Bolzano argues, there is an essential difference between the two examples insofar as Σ1 is the objective ground for S1, and S1 is therefore entailed by Σ1, whereas this is not true for <Σ2, S2> (RW I, 13 f., WL II, 341, WL IV, 15, 32 34, 261 263, 385 ff., 493, 580 f).
The main difference between the two examples is the sample size: quite small in the former, quite large in the latter example.
"Dragons abound in mythology beyond the legend of King Arthur…" Use the similarities and the differences between the two examples to create a transition.
The upper 30 km vary between the six example models from 20 to 10,000 Ω m.
You should notice that the difference between these two examples is the authority of the messenger, not the message itself.
It is obvious than the error lies between the error in the two example above.
The difference between these two examples — His and Hers — is that the G.O.P. isn't done talking to men when it finishes talking about guns, but the Democratic Party is done talking to women when it finishes talking about uteruses.
My sense is that the line is somewhere between those two examples, but decided to ask some experts for clarity on when the whole "adulting" thing means you really need to get your own place or suffer some sort of developmental not to mention interpersonal consequences.
