Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
For the comparison of surface structures between the tested implants, two regions of interest were selected: machined and rough area (compare Figs. 1 and 3).
Similar(59)
The sole difference between these 2 tested implant types was therefore the specific surface microtopography.
The control c.p. titanium implants had an oxide thickness of 17 200 nm while the test implants revealed an oxide thickness between 600 and 1000 nm.
The test implants are more often rods than screws.
The two other ROIs were located (i) in the immediate vicinity of the test implant and (ii) between the two implants.
To this end, we analyzed two additional ROIs, that is, cortical and trabecular bone immediately distal to the test implant) and midway between both implants).
The test implant with the best % BIC results was Test 3, which comprised a Ti-6Al-7Nb implant with anodised surface.
The anchorage implant was inserted on the tibia's long axis, 8 mm distal of the test implant.
In general, the histomorphometrical parameters (bone to implant contact and newly formed bone) revealed significant quantitative differences between the control and test implants.
Average values of bone-implant contact (% BIC) in the best three consecutive threads showed that there was a marked difference in % BIC between control and test implants after 1-month healing.
While resonant frequency analysis did not show evidence of changes in implant stability quotient between control and test implants, histomorphometric analysis revealed significant increase in bone-implant contact of anodised in comparison to sandblasted implants.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com