Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(25)
No significant difference was found between the weights of the major organs (liver, spleen, kidney, ovaries, and testes) between the test groups (both female and male) and negative control group (P > 0.05), as shown in Table 5.
Statistical comparisons were made between the different groups, between the test groups and the control group, and between the flaps from different anatomical locations.
There were no significant differences between the test groups and the control group in terms of compressions or ventilations at the beginning and end of the semester, however groups C and D performed significantly better primary surveys (Airway, Breathing, Circulation — ABC sequences) during the initial testing.
The statistical significance of difference between the test groups was analyzed by student's t-test (two tailed).
In our study, small numbers of CD4+ Tregs were identified in the gut of animals, but without significant differences between the test groups.
However, there were no statistical differences between the test groups and the control group.
Similar(35)
For other organs such as the liver, heart, lung, brain, and kidney, no statistical difference was observed between the test group and the control group (P < 0.05).
The difference between the test group and the unilateral group was significant (p = 0.048, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
Data for milk components, temperature treatment and pH treatment assay were analyzed by T test using SPSS 13.0, to detect difference between the test group and control group.
t tests were performed to calculate statistical significance of genes expression between the test group and control group.
For miR-200c target TCF2 verification, no significant difference was found between the test group and the three control groups (Fig. 4b and c).
More suggestions(19)
between the test populations
between the trial groups
between the experiment groups
between the test population
between the experimental groups
between the test characteristics
between the test masses
between the test scores
between the test data
between the test types
between the test results
between the test cells
between the test requests
between the test conditions
between the analyzed groups
between the comparison groups
between the vaccine groups
between the sample groups
between the diagnostic groups
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com