Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The log rank test was used to compare the survival rates between the study groups.
Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the study groups.
No difference regarding the time to first analgesic demand was found between the study groups.
There was no significant difference in platelet activation and adhesion between the study groups.
Both interventions were associated with a decline in fat-free mass (FFM) over the study period (P<0.0001); however, no difference was found between the study groups.
Sixth, there were baseline differences between the study groups.
Fig. 3 Cure rates between the study groups.
As shown in table 3, there were no significant differences between the study groups at baseline.
P value of 0.05 or less signifies significant differences between the study groups.
There was no significant difference in microorganism's distribution between the study groups: p = 0.65 (Fig. 2).
Nevertheless, the number of thrombotic episodes was small and not different between the study groups.
More suggestions(19)
between the student groups
between the education groups
between the trial groups
between the students groups
between the study population
between the study years
between the study parameters
between the study areas
between the study cases
between the study factors
between the study drugs
between the study variables
between the study regions
between the study designs
between the study treatments
between the study phases
between the study arms
between the study sites
between the study locations
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com