Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
There were statistically significant differences between the skeletal classes in S2 to UL.
There were no statistically significant differences between the skeletal classes in case of B line to UL (p > 0.05).
Similar(58)
However, if samples had been based on cephalometric values like large ANB differences, incisor relations or profile assessment, we could have seen significant differences between all the skeletal classes.
The difference was significant only between the skeletal class II and III malocclusion groups, and the length of the mandibular ramus was relatively longer in the skeletal class III malocclusion group (Table 6).
The difference between the skeletal class II and III malocclusion groups was significant, and the length of mandibular ramus in the skeletal class III malocclusion group was relatively longer than in the other two groups (Table 5).
With regard to the average P measurements (l-MF), there was a significant difference between the skeletal class III malocclusion group and the other two groups: 0.73 mm above the occlusal plane in the normal occlusion group, 0.70 mm above the occlusal plane in the skeletal class II malocclusion group, and 3.56 mm above the occlusal plane in the skeletal class III malocclusion group.
Comparison was done among the skeletal classes to access the sagittal lip position using five reference lines.
There were no statistically significant differences in BOP-SN angle of the skeletal class I and skeletal class III groups between pre- and post-treatment.
The skeletal class determination was performed by calculating the angular relationship between nasion (N), sellion (S), and Down's points A and B, obtained from the lateral cephalogram.
The skeletal class.
The BOP and FOP were steep in the skeletal class II group, while in skeletal class I and class III groups they were flat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com