Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
No significant differences was observed between the sieving coefficients in CVVH (0.71 ± 0.001) compared to CVVHD (0.69 ± 0.02).
Similar(59)
At high sieving coefficient ratios, both yield and purity increase concurrently in a three stage system, whereas at a low ratio of the sieving coefficients, the yield and purity become inversely proportional on the retentate side.
The sieving coefficients were low (0.07 and 0.09) at T15' and T60', with a significant increase at T6h to 0.19 (P < 0.05).
The sieving coefficients with the SHF membrane at 3 l/hour UF and 4 l/hour UF were 72.2% and 68.8%, respectively.
The sieving coefficient is between 0.87 and 1.0 and is not different between CVVH and CVVHD [ 72, 73].
The sieving coefficient was low and did not differ between groups, with medians ranging from 0.2 to 0.4.
The sieving coefficient reflects the membrane potential to transport solutes by convection and is particularly useful for hemofiltration.
The sieving coefficient (SC) was 0.85 ± 0.05.
The inverse of σ is the sieving coefficient.
Uchino and coworkers [ 27] examined the sieving coefficient for chloride during HVHF and found a sieving coefficient for chloride in excess of 1.
Adsorption and the sieving coefficient are independent of the type of haemofilter membrane.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com