Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Owing to differences between the screening programmes and study designs, further comparison between both studies is limited.
The Communities (French- [that is, the FWB], Flemish-, and German-speaking) therefore have the opportunity to develop their own prevention policies, giving rise to a platform for comparison between the screening programmes available to the populations of the Communities.
Similar(58)
Relative risk ratios were estimated by log-binomial regression to assess the association between knowledge of the screening programme, knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors, and reasons for non-participation (dependent variables) and socio-demographic characteristics (independent variables) that include mother tongue/ethnicity, place of residence, age, and number of children.
Multiperspectival interviews allowed us to understand the dynamics between patients, professionals and the Screening Programme, and to explore similarities and differences in their perceptions to highlight potentially differing needs and suggestions for improving services.
We compute the net costs of screening as the difference in the total costs between the simulation in which the screening programme is implemented and a simulation without cervical screenings after 2011.
Sasieni studied data from the screening programme between 2004 and 2017, looking at the number of eligible women who were sent invitations each year from the ages of 45 to 70.
The screening programme was implemented in the Netherlands between 1998 and 2001.
Future plans between TBS and Longhill include possibly extending the screening programme to year 10s, who are an average age of 15.
Differences in the proportion of women re-attending the screening programme were tested between women who experienced a false-positive referral and those with a negative screen.
All women participating in the screening programme at Preventicon screening centre between October 2003 and December 2007 were included in the study.
Between November 22, 2010 and December 31 , 2011 a total of 29,652 women were invited to the screening programme.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com