Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
The ratio of MDR between the sampling locations was comparable (46.5-71.4%) (Table 2).
Similar(59)
Analyses suggest high levels of genetic differentiation between the sample locations, with a global FST of 0.239, and pairwise FST values ranging from 0.100 to 0.395.
As depicted in Table 3, TFC varied significantly between the sampled locations.
The differences that this study has found between the sampled locations in TFC and individual flavonoid compounds could be related to environmental conditions such as light intensity, precipitation and temperature levels, and geographical differences.
Generic E. coli concentration (MPN/100 mL) increased by 60.1% for each 1 m/s increase in wind speed and decreased by 3% for each 10 m increase in the distance between the sample location and rangeland.
The measurements at t = 2 were performed to investigate the effect of transport between the collection point and the sampling location.
Soil nutrient content and saturated hydraulic conductivity were the largest, while bulk density and the coarse sand content were the lowest at the sampling location of half-way between taproot and downslope edge of the canopy.
Both metal and PAH concentration distributions were highly correlated between the four sampling locations suggesting the presence of one or perhaps only a few sources of these pollutants which remain persistent as sediment is transported from street to stream.
The results from both assays showed significant differences in the antioxidant activity between the different sampling locations and solvent type (Table 2), with aqueous extracts having greater DPPH and FRAP activity than the ethanol extracts.
The agricultural landscape (cultivated vs. uncultivated area) and the abundance of cotton in the cropping system (Guider > Djalingo > Tcholliré) differed significantly between the three sampling locations.
There was a large amount of variation between the two sample locations for each of the three major haplogroups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com