Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
A comparison between the samples indicated that they showed different trends, yet when pooled, the two samples indicated a significant decrease in hazardous use over time following hospitalization.
Similar(59)
NMDS ordinations attempt to place all samples in an arbitrary two-dimensional space, in which the relative distances between the samples indicate the corresponding pairwise similarity.
The carbohydrate fraction was unchanged between the samples, indicating the main constituents of the cell wall were not affected by ScAGU115 expression.
A high correlation coefficient of 0.82 0.98 was observed among the samples, indicating low variability between replicates.
Identification of differences in trends in the rates of volatile evolution between these samples indicated the precise vacuum conditions at the time of irradiation had a major influence.
Between 72% and 92% of the sample indicated a response of 'strongly agree' or 'somewhat agree' with the school cohesion items, with "people care about each other in this school" receiving the lowest favorable rating and "I feel a part of this school" receiving the highest rating.
The correlations between samples (indicated by heatmaps) were calculated using Spearman's ranking of smoothed 4C-seq signals (11 fragment window size) over the combined genomic intervals as used in Woltering et al. (2014), with the HoxD cluster itself excluded.
A comparison between the two samples indicates that narrower and less connected cleating system results in more frequent coal fines generation and migration, resulting in significant permeability fluctuations with general decreasing trend.
Radiation shielding properties of the basalt samples indicated a strong correlation between photon energy absorption parameters and values of EABF and EBF of basalt samples.
Lattice-resolved HRTEM micrographs (Fig. 5b) clearly reveal the interface between the head and body parts of samples, indicated by the yellow dotted lines.
However, there is considerable variation in volatilization between the samples as indicated by the SDs, showing that there is room for further improvement of the method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com