Let C be the event that the sample average length falls within some specified confidence interval, then (8) is the probability that differences between the sample and library average lengths are attributable to the sampling effect [ 26].
Partial Procrustes distance, the square root of the summed squared Euclidean distances between homologous landmarks between each specimen and the sample average shape [65], was calculated of all of the specimens.
In HB modeling, the sample averages (prior information) are used to update the individual utilities in a number of iterations until the sample averages stop changing between iterations.
In hierarchical Bayes modeling, the sample averages (prior information) are used to update the individual utilities in a number of iterations until the sample averages stop changing between iterations.
Log reduction was calculated as the difference between the samples and average zero time logarithms.
Focusing on studies reporting between-subject correlations (619 men and 1,059 women), there was a near-significant association between the average sample age and subjective-genital agreement for men, r(20) = .42, p = .05, and a small and non-significant association for women, r(42) = .18, p = .25.25
There was an average difference between the sample with the lowest Ct and the NTC of 6.01 cycles and an average difference between the minus RT and its corresponding reverse transcribed sample of 8.74 cycles.
At the gene level (correlation between paired blood/lung samples), average SRCC was positive and significant: average SRCC = 0.06, N = 22,704, P = 3.1 · 10−8.
The difference between the sampling strategies is weak; the average t1 primarily matters, though the exponential distribution shows the greatest effect primarily because the distribution of times is more widespread with such sampling schemes with long tails (truncation in t1 = 0.2 like other time sampling schemes provides similar results for the three distributions; results not shown).
For single EE2 and E2 exposures, data variation between the sampling days was higher, with an average CV of 70% for E2 and 80% for EE2, and 27% for all positive controls (100 ng/L EE2).
The expected decrease in triglyceride content, as observed in Figure 1 (signal 17), was the major difference between the treated and non-treated samples (average ratio TCDD: DMSO = 0.5).
