Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The procedure is verified by good agreement between the predicted temperature profiles and the experimental ones.
Similar(59)
First, the postponement was due mostly to the predicted temperature, not actual precipitation.
Nevertheless, no appreciable difference could be found for the predicted temperatures between S6 and S8 approximations.
The experimental and the predicted temperatures were in good agreement throughout the entire examined temperature range between 20 and 200∘C.
Close agreement between the measured and predicted temperature results confirms the thermal property results.
It clearly indicated from Fig. 7 that there is a close agreement between the measured and predicted temperature at all stages of fire loading.
Good agreement was observed between CFD predicted temperature profiles and experimental temperature data.
The thermal profiles predicted temperature differences between surface and bottom of around 40 °C during summer time, with a maximum temperature of 75 °C.
Such a local significance of permeable faults was implied by the slightly decreased temperature misfit between predicted temperatures and measured values in the area of the Landshut-Neuöttinger High after the implementation of permeable faults into model 3. Summarizing, our results show that the basin-scale thermal field is caused by a combination of conductive and advective heat transport.
The uncertainty for predicted rainfall is much greater than for predicted temperature; although all of the models predict a temperature increase between 2 and 6°C, the predicted changes in rainfall differ in even their sign and range from a decline of 400% to an increase of 260%.
The study is devoted to the comparison between the predicted fluid temperature values by the DST and MLAA models, with special attention to the influence of the BHE geometry (matrix like vs in line configurations) and to the shape of the yearly hourly load profiles (balanced vs unbalanced ground loads).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com