Sentence examples for between the predicted position from inspiring English sources
On the Y-axis, the difference between the predicted position for the condylar marker and the actual position of the marker on the stereolithographic models was −0.9 ± 2.6.
On the Z-axis, the difference between the predicted position for the condylar marker and the actual position of the marker on the stereolithographic models was 0.04 ± 0.8 mm.
Results: On the X-axis, the difference between the predicted position for the condylar marker and the actual position of the marker on the stereolithographic models was 0.6 ± 1.1 mm.
Substituting (118) and (119) into (120), the relationship between the predicted position and the measured position and velocity is expressed as begin{array}rcl@ X_{mathrm{p}} z) = frac{h_{1} z)}{h_{2} z)}X_{mathrm{o}} z)+frac{2beta z z-1)}{h_{2}(z z-1_{mathrm{o}}(z), end{h_{2} z(121).
Substituting (82) to (84), (87), and (88) into (79), the relationship between the predicted position and the measured position and velocity is written as {fontsize{9.2pt}{9.6pt}selectfont{begin{aligned} X_{mathrm{p}} z) &= frac{alpha}{z+alpha-1}X_{mathrm{o}} z &quad+frac{z((2beta+gamma z-2beta+gamma)} {2 z+alpha-1)(z^{2}+(beta+gamma-2 z-beta+1)} TV_{mathrm{o}}(z).
From Equations 14 and 15, x ^ k is the sum of the state prediction and the deviation between the observation and the predicted position at time k on the one hand, and the magnitude of x ^ k depends on how large the deviation is modified by P k on the other hand.
The difference between the actual position and the predicted position was recorded.
The structural agreement between the predicted positions in both SSUs demonstrates that equivalence at the secondary structure level translates into accurate superposition in 3D.
Indeed the Scc1 C-terminus is so close to the predicted position of the Smc3 head, that it would be surprising if no contact existed between the two.
We then used RMSD-based superposition to minimize the sum of distances between the peaks in the map and the predicted positions on the toxin.
Four out of the six had significant changes of the PWM at the predicted positions in the mutagenesis study (Table 3), including the top-scoring pair among all predictions, between Leu60 and position -1.
