Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
In this paper, a mathematical relationship between the network weights and the transfer function parameters is derived.
Similar(58)
To further understand the differences between these various approaches, we compare the network weights that were assigned to individual networks.
The explicit relations between the values of the diagonal entries of the Gramian and the network weights are also established.
Then, the parameters of RBF network, including the network weight, the position, and shape of basis functions, are modified adaptively until the error signal between the network output a and the expected output reaches the minimum value.
Pairwise correlations between the gene expression trajectories provide the correlation network weights shown in Table 5.
The final network output is computed using the Softmax activation function [3] to ensure that network output is a valid probability between 0 and 1. Network weights are updated using the back-propagation training algorithm [4].
The ELM is a fast learning method used to calculate network weights between output and hidden layers in a single iteration and thus, can dramatically reduce learning time while producing accurate results with minimal training data.
Network weights are computed by transforming the Euclidean distances measured between data according to a Gaussian model.
In the proximity networks, weights are proportional to the total time two individuals spent in each other's proximity, whereas in the communication networks weight is the number of contacts between the individuals (irrespective of the length of the contact).
The backpropagation algorithm works by computing the error between the network output and the corresponding target value and propagating this backward through the network to update the weights.
The correlation weights are similar to the linear regression weights; however, the redundancy between the networks is not accounted for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com