Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The reasons that justify the different results found between the methods studied are unknown.
Similar(59)
The fundamental difference between the two search methods studied here, BM25 and CO, stems from their different modelling of the collection of EHRs: in BM25, every document is modelled as a bag of keywords.
The agreement between the methods was studied by the Bland and Altman method with calculation of bias and the limits of agreement [ 31].
20 21 This study showed concordance between the methods used for the variables studied except for calcium and blood gas levels; and equivalence except for pCO2 and pO2.
During the 120 years between the pandemics studied different methods of data collection (case reporting) have been used.
From the patient data, we found a similar trend in absorbed doses as with the cRC values: ARS produced the highest absorbed dose estimates between the methods evaluated in this study due to systematically higher activity estimates at every acquisition time point.
Therefore, low oxygen isotope elimination may lead to the differences between the methods seen in this study.
The limits of agreement between the methods found in the study were wider than the priori estimate of mean dmft/DMFT value to be within ± 0.3 for the samples overall.
When data from the four methods of detection in all cases were merged, we found 100% concordance in CNVs detected in the 1q21.1 locus between the methods used in this study.
Such discrepancy may have several causes, including polymorphism in the protein sequence between the populations/strains studied by each method, incorrect genome annotation, redundancy or errors in the aminoacid sequences, possible post-translational modifications and, in the case of secreted proteins, discrepancies between the predicted and the actual size of the clipped signal peptide.
Correlated results between the methods were similarly reported by prior studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com