Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(33)
The reason of the discrepancy between the methods is discussed.
Comparison between the methods is made regarding the experimental estimation of traction vectors both point-wise and in an L2-norm over the boundary in question.
The correlation between the methods is high (R = 0.99).
The precision comparison between the methods is thus case-by-case and inconclusive.
In general, the correlation between the methods is very high, as can be expected from their relationship [9].
The main difference between the methods is securing the airway either after or before the division of the flap.
Similar(27)
Extensive comparisons between the methods are presented.
The correlation coefficients between the methods were 0.9926 and 0.9939 for δD and δ18O, respectively.
Three of 59 (5.0%) NPWs were positive, and agreement between the methods was 98%.
Thus, the degree of the difference in these two parametric values between the methods was similar.
When taking the sectoral level into account, most differences between the methods are well below 1%.
More suggestions(15)
between the races is
between the methods has
between the advisers is
between the companies is
between the species is
between the Extremes is
between the islands is
between the dancers is
between the studies is
between the wickets is
between the academics is
between the cities is
between the men is
between the sheets is
between the sexes is
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com