Sentence examples for between the groups considered from inspiring English sources

The findings of the present study were that the clinically and statistically significant differences in pain intensity and disability between the groups remained at 26 and 52 weeks, and that the differences between the groups considered over one year were statistically significant (p < 0.01) also when consideration was taken to the covariance between the repeated measurements.

Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analyses showed that differences between the groups considered over one year were statistically significant regarding an improvement in pain (p = 0.002), and disability on CPQ (p = 0.005) and disability on WDQ (p < 0.001), favoring the Index Group.

Differences between the groups considering new bone formation, soft tissues, and remaining BC were statistically evaluated.

There were no significant differences between the groups considering age and gender.

Independent T test was performed to determine differences between the groups considering MPDD condition.

As concerns BI-1 expression, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001 by Kruskal Wallis test) emerged between the five groups considered (Control, CH, CIRR, PHCC, HCC).

Similarly, total microbial growth did not differ between the two groups considering the tracheal aspirate samples collected before extubation.

Also, despite adjusting for proxy indicators, e.g., wealth, exposure to infection might still have differed between the study groups, considering the patchy malaria transmission in Kumasi (6 ).

To test the difference between groups considered in PD scale for the Cluster A of SWAP-200 multivariate analysis of variance was performed, and showed that the Groups Effect was significant, (Wilk's Lambda(4,60) < .001; p < 0.001): this result underlines that at least two groups are different in the scores for Personality Disorders and High Functioning, considered as a whole.

The statistical hypothesis test of the difference between groups considered in Q-factor scale of SWAP-200 was significant (Wilk's Lambda(2,62) = 0.11; p < 0.001); this meant that at least two groups considered in the Schizophrenia Spectrum scale of Q-factor scale of SWAP-200 test were different.

Figure 2 illustrates the cumulative probability function showing the likelihood of cost difference between the two groups considering hospitalizations due to HF and LV lead surgical revision.