Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Further, we found no statistical significances in the frequencies of natural killer cells (n = 83) and monocytes (n = 46) between the groups analyzed.
There was no significant difference between the groups analyzed and the class of antimicrobials empirically prescribed (p>0.05).
The overall analysis of the weaning time from MV showed no differences between the groups analyzed by this study.
However, MMP-2 is not represented in the sea bream microarray and although MMP-9 is represented (SAPD23115) it did not change significantly between the groups analyzed.
Superoxide production by human infected macrophages increased after 96 h of infection but there was no statistical difference in superoxide production between the groups analyzed after 48 and 96 h.
The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare variation in gene expression between the groups analyzed and the Fisher's exact test used to compare differences in frequency distributions.
Similar(52)
At week 50, no significant difference in tumor development was observed between the two groups analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot.
The rates of the retainers' failure between the groups were analyzed using Chi-square test.
The difference in PaCO2 and ETCO2 between the groups was analyzed by independent t-test.
Six months after surgery, there was no significant difference between the groups, as analyzed by lateral cephalogram.
Differences in continuous data between the groups were analyzed by using Student's t-test for normally distributed variables.
More suggestions(15)
between the groups investigated
between the groups evaluated
between the groups analysed
between the groups analysis
between the diatoms analyzed
between the materials analyzed
between the works analyzed
between the factors analyzed
between the markers analyzed
between the points analyzed
between the species analyzed
between the SNPs analyzed
between the genes analyzed
between the parameters analyzed
between the tags analyzed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com