Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(39)
No statistically significant differences were found between males and females or between the five groups of potential users.
Arterial pressure, wedge pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output did not differ between the five groups (Additional file 1: Figures S8 to S10).
The influence of infection in not-at-risk and at-risk drinkers is documented in Table 2. B lymphocytes, noncytotoxic T lymphocytes, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and CD16– monocytes varied significantly when compared between the five groups of patients (see P values listed in the right most column).
Analysis of normalized gene expression data identified 219 probe sets (40 unannotated ESTs, 10 redundant probe sets, 169 annotated genes (Table S1) whose expression levels differentiated between the five groups.
Furthermore, calculation of expected unique and shared types between the five groups in case of random distribution revealed that the observed numbers of shared types between all the different groups was significantly lower than what would have been expected, except between group III and IV (table 4).
The mRNA expression of podocin, synaptopodin, and TGF-β1 did not differ between the five groups.
Similar(19)
The difference between the two groups is statistically significant.
The earning gap between the two groups has been accelerating.
Tensions between the two groups are in check.
Lake says there is "some synergy" between the two groups.
There is much common ground between the two groups.
More suggestions(16)
between the five series
between the five population
between the five trials
between the five phones
between the five structures
between the five Rivers
between the five members
between the five bags
between the five murders
between the five constructs
between the five links
between the five tests
between the five men
between the five towns
between the five stars
between the five partners
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com