Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Chi-square test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the expected data and the observed data in one or more categories.
Similar(58)
Rate ratios for suicide between the actual and the expected data were also calculated.
Although a precise congruence between the calculated data and the expected data is not obtained, total deviation of 3 °C at the peak can be considered acceptable.
A residual measures the difference between the observed data, and the expected data under the assumption of the model.
The experimental data showed 97.24% resemblance with the expected data.
For the sake of clarity only those results obtained with the whole protein and the SLiM region with and without flanking residues are displayed, but results with windows of intermediate sizes lie in-between, as expected (data not shown).
The Q-Q plot results showed an obvious deviation between the real and expected data and indicated that the association detected on pig chromosome SSC7 (SSC Sus scrofa) is statistically significant.
After conditioned analysis, the results of the Q-Q plot showed an obvious deviation between the real and expected data and indicated that associations on SSC2 and SSC4 are statistically significant.
However, based on the extent of the respective variance components and the criteria of model fit, the set of level I variables mentioned above appeared to account for most of the outcome variance and provided the best fit between observed and expected data.
Although actual typing data were available for a few of the strains tested, we observed fairly good agreement between actual and expected data.
The Hosmer– Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed a good agreement between observed and expected data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com