The study also used electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to observe differences between the different cell brands at different stages of discharge during the different discharge test sequences.
Over all, there were no significant differences between the different cell culture treatments (p > 0.05).
This discrepancy might be explained by differences between the different cell models employed (mouse vs. human) and by different experimental settings.
The differences in the evaluability between the different cell counts were not statistically significant.
However, differences were noticed between the different cell lines regarding the expression of particular isoforms.
No major differences were found between the different cell types in the expression of elongation factor (Fig. 7).
U373 cells treated with the same concentrations of tbH2O2 as the neuronal cultures showed no difference in viability between the different cell lines (I,J).
This suggests that the difference in the expression level between the different cell lines is mainly attributable to the level of rtTA expression driven by the CMV promoter.
To detect the differences in gene expression levels between the different cell lines, we next performed a microarray experiment using the same cell line panel (Fig. 1b).
Differences in the regulation of secretion between the different cell types with reduced/absent levels of REP-1 could explain the tissue specific degeneration that occurs in choroideremia.
As seen previously in Figure 5, no significant difference in net distance traveled was observed between the different cell lines when inoculated on randomly oriented PCL nanofiber regardless of the presence of a CXCL12 gradient.
