Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In other words, our participants with ID may have positively replied to the question "Are you currently ill or in poor health" due to the presence of mild, acute illness (flu, minor viral infections, etc).. Also no discriminative capacity was found between the criterion groups generated by the question "Do you have a disability (impairment or limitation)?" in the ID subsample.
Similar(59)
In the ID subsample, discriminative capacity between these criterion groups (healthy and not healthy) was inconsistent (Tables 9 and 10).
It is also important to collect comparative data between control and criterion groups, since the sample of children presented herein shows learning difficulties.
While there are certain consistencies between the criteria offered by the different groups, important differences exist.
Comparison between the early colonizer and late colonizer strains found 416 genes that were differentially enriched between the two groups (criteria IV, Table 2, Figure 10, Additional file 9 and Additional file 10).
For assessment of the correlation of the HbA1c criteria with the OGTT criteria between the ethnic groups, the probability of obtaining an HbA1c ≥6.5% in a person who meets the OGTT criteria for diabetes (FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L or 2hPG ≥11.1 mmol/L) and the probability of obtaining an HbA1c <6.5% in a person without diabetes according to the OGTT criteria were calculated.
Clinical features were not significantly different between the ICHD-3β and EO criteria groups (P > 0.05), and neither were outcomes of prophylaxis (P = 0.966).
Distinguishing between the two groups of criteria that are used for species delimitation, the pattern-oriented and the process-oriented criteria, is useful [ 7].
There is no significant difference between the two groups in the criteria selecting university and course program.
There was no statistical difference in baseline criteria between the diagnostic groups.
There were no significant differences in other diagnostic criteria between the 2 groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com