Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
We highlight selected regions for an improved conspicuousness of the differences between the considered methods; see Fig. 3: Images without noise: Rudin, Osher, and Fatemi (ROF) [1], Vese and Osher (VO) [9], Starck, Elad, and Donoho (SED) [11], and TV Gabor (TVG) by Aujol et al. [12] models.
Similar(59)
Section 2 presents the relations between the three considered methods.
With no HPA distortions (i.e. IBO = ∞), Fig. 6 a shows the BER comparisons between all considered methods.
The six considered methods are.
Results are presented and compared directly to each other in term of safety index in order to allow for a concrete appraisal of the most relevant differences between the considered design methods, highlighting also the influence associated with the approaches to modelling the geometric imperfection effects.
Therefore, to study interactions between enhancers and promoters, investigators should consider methods such as Capture-C [ 139] or HiCap [ 86] since they not only provide better resolution, but also can detect hundreds of interactions in one experiment.
Also, in the case of albedo, the agreement between the two considered experimental methods is satisfactory, taking into account that the spectrophotometric method provides an upper limit for albedo within the Rayleigh hypothesis as discussed.
In the presence of only AWGN, Fig. 3 a d shows the BLER comparisons between the two considered detection methods with N c set to 8, 16, 32 and 64, respectively.
The results obtained in this study indicate that there are marked differences between the three methods considered, and that vent areas calculated according to DIN-Report 140 for either bursting panels or explosion doors seem to be very conservative.
There was no difference between the construction methods considered (M50%, MRe and TCM).
The authors considered the method useful, especially when there was a lack of genetic ties between countries.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com