Exact(1)
The GRS analysis revealed a small difference between the case population (Mean = 38.6, SD = 3.7) and control samples (Mean = 37.4, SD = 3.7).
Similar(59)
No comparisons were made between the small case population and either of the two large populations because of the confounding effects of the sampling size and selection intensity.
Differences between the two case populations were statistically not palpable (Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) but the HLC-sample was enriched with NSCLC-cases.
Power is estimated over 5,000 replicates of data, with no divergence between the case-control population and the external cohorts (F ST = 0).
Power is estimated over 5,000 replicates of data, for a range of F ST between the case-control population and external cohorts.
This resulted in a significant difference in the age groups between the case and control population.
To determine whether our classification results were affected either by age, smoking status, or smoking history, which are the demographics with significant differences between the case and control populations (Table 2), we compared the classifier performance on subsets of the training set population divided into groups based on the median value of these attributes.
In addition haplotype analysis did not reveal differences between the case and control populations.
There were no significant differences in SEIFA scores between the case and control populations.
Phase II analyses were adjusted by age, given the mean differences between the case and control populations for these cohorts.
To determine whether any significant differences in polymorphism frequencies occurred between the case and control populations, allele and genotype frequencies were compared using the chi-square method and the Monte Carlo style CLUMP analysis program [ 11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com