*Significant difference between test groups and control at P < 0.05 ** Significant difference between test groups and control at P < 0.01 Table 6 presents the effect of the methanolic extract of Phyllanthus muellerianus on different sera biochemical parameters of male and female rats.
ANOVA *Significant difference between test groups and control at P < 0.05 ** Significant difference between test groups and control at P < 0.01 Table 5 presents results of the effect of Piptadeniastrum africana on different liver biochemical parameters of male and female rats.
The change in methylation level between the test groups at the Chr.
For the GR gene, post hoc comparisons revealed no significant differences between any test groups at the 0.05 level.
No significant differences in BoP, SoP, and mean PPD were detected between control and test group at 3 months after surgery, neither in the "crude" nor in the "adjusted" analysis.
The regression coefficients indicate the average differences in clinical outcomes between the control and test group at 3-month follow-up BoP bleeding on probing, SoP suppuration on probing, PPD probing pocket depth, 95% CI 95% confidence interval aAdjusted for baseline values bAdjusted for baseline values, smoking, and mean bone loss at baseline.
Furthermore, according to the Mann-Whitney U test, there was no statistically significant difference in the ALP level between the control and the test group at each measurement.
Furthermore, according to the Mann-Whitney U test, there was a statistically significant difference in the OC level between the control and the test group at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks.
The primary comparison of disease rates between test negative groups (at entry screen) will not control for potential confounding factors since they are not balanced by randomization and the tests may select for different characteristics.
Follow-up independent samples t tests between groups at each time point were conducted when ANOVA results indicated significant differences over time by group.
