Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
All other differences of TTP and OS between subgroups were small and not statistically significant.
Similar(59)
For the NOIS and the NHFR, the number of cases included makes statistical power an issue when differences between subgroups are small or the numbers are low.
The subgroups were small, but allowed for exploratory analysis between biomarker expression and EFS.
We identified few moderators, owing to the fact most subgroups were small and affected by high heterogeneity within the group.
However, the subgroups were small.
But subgroups were small [ 14].
It should be noted, however, that subgroups were small.
In our study, although the extent of the variation in colonoscopy uptake between population subgroups was small, it varied most by quintiles of area-level ethnic diversity and by region.
Other observed statistically significant differences between subgroups were very small and therefore not important.
Differences between subgroups were significant (P=0.02), but only the greater effect for small frequent doses seems clinically plausible (fig 5).
The differences in distributions of findings between subgroups were analysed with Fischer's exact test for categorical data due to the small sample sizes of subgroups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com