Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Bivariate correlations between study variables at baseline and pain-related disability at the 12-month follow-up are reported in Table 3.
Similar(59)
Adjusted odds ratio was used to determine the strength of association between the study variables at 95% CI and P value <0.05.
Significant interactions (at the 1% significance level) between study variables for prognostic/predictive utility (survival, ORR) were sought.
Table 4 Correlations between study variables Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.
No interactions were found between the study variables.
Table 4 reports correlations between the study variables.
The results from the simulation study showed that mean estimates became substantially biased even at relatively weak dependencies between follow-up variables and attrition, whereas estimates of associations between variables were more robust to dependencies between attrition and study variables.
No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found on any other study variable neither at baseline nor at the 12-month follow-up.
As mentioned above, most of the study variables and observed correlations between HO-1 and other variables were highly consistent between the original study and replication study.
All the study variables were used for comparisons between groups.
Following descriptive analysis of the study variables, bivariate analysis was performed to identify associations between the dependent variables (DVs: social and emotional loneliness) and independent variables (IVs), level of significance set at p < 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com