Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
We conducted a meta-analysis to ascertain the strength and consistency of the association between study results and formal publication.
These differences may contribute to the discrepancy between study results, and undermines the discussion of our present results.
The odds ratio was used as the outcome statistic to measure the association between study results and subsequent publication.
However, due to insufficient data, it was impossible to exclude the impact of confounding factors on the observed association between study results and formal publication.
Previous studies reporting on concordance between study results and conclusions found that industry-sponsored trials were less concordant than non-industry studies [ 6].
Given the expected large variation in study characteristics, attention will also be paid to the association between study results and study characteristics.
Similar(51)
Its description is followed by a qualitative, or descriptive, synthesis – with critical appraisal – of observed patterns of similarity within and covariation between study results, methods and populations.
Heterogeneity between individual study results and between summary risk estimates for the two histological types was also calculated using this method.
Antispasmodics were of benefit, but again heterogeneity between study results was significant, and there was evidence of publication bias.
A relationship between study results (the effect size) and daily prone duration was sought with meta-regression.
We analyzed this data with the goal of describing the relationship between nonclinical study results and Phase 1 study outcomes.
More suggestions(15)
between search results and
between study attributes and
between study sessions and
between analysis results and
between simulation results and
between study types and
between study groups and
between study completers and
between study designs and
between study years and
between laboratory results and
between study approaches and
between study sites and
between study patients and
between study participants and
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com