Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
To compare the expected percentage increase between studies is problematic because it is relative.
Similar(59)
The drawback is that the OTUs are so method-dependent that comparisons between studies are problematic.
6 8 15 16 Comparisons between studies are problematic given the heterogeneity in population characteristics, age at assessment and outcome measures.
Scoring key: + Fully or mostly scores 1 - Not at all ~ Partly scores 0. The heterogeneity of outcomes and, in particular, the interventions meant that making comparisons between studies was problematic.
Comparing exposure levels between countries using data from these first studies is problematic, however, because different types of measurement devices and/or different measurement and analysis procedures have been used.
However, comparing incidence between and within countries as estimated in research studies is problematic.
Bearing in mind the variation between the study populations, and the application of a different methodology and instruments, direct comparison between the anxiety rates in our study and those of previous studies is problematic.
Selection within studies is problematic.
Judging the results of association studies is problematic.
The service design model identified in this study is problematic.
Cross comparison between studies is also problematic.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com