Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Differences in costs between studies are likely due to differing risk definitions, health plan inclusion, and propensity scoring strategies.
Differences between studies are likely due to methodological variations in regards to dose, route of administration and treatment duration.
Differences in length of stay between studies are likely to be influenced by the case mix and supply side factors discussed above.
However, because of differences in stimulus intensity and methodology for estimation of localization error, similarities in threshold values between studies are likely not directly comparable.
Differing findings between studies are likely due to the smaller size and possibly greater homogeneity of the sample in the French study.
The differences between studies are likely explained by differences in the assessment and the prevalence of the risk factors and RRs between populations, different calculations of PAFs, and differences in subsequent gains in life expectancy.
Similar(50)
The high heterogeneity between studies is likely due to the wide range of total overdose events reported among the four studies.
The reason behind this discrepancy between studies is likely the difference in experimental designs: measurements were performed once in each session in the study of Leon-Sarmiento et al. [12], at baseline in the EL session and after 30 min of LD in the LD session.
One source of variation between studies is likely to be the presence of CNVs segregating within inbred strains.
One of the important sources of variability of effect estimates between studies is likely related to exposure definition and misclassification.
Variability in phenotypic characterization of endometriosis cases between studies is likely to contribute to the heterogeneity in findings, and may result in genetic risk variants going undetected due to dilution of the strength of association.
More suggestions(16)
between disturbances are likely
between males are likely
between ministers are likely
between raters are likely
between communities are likely
between studies are problematic
between genotypes are likely
between populations are likely
between studies are inconsistent
between seasons are likely
between datasets are likely
between species are likely
between regions are likely
between studies are unclear
between experiments are likely
between countries are likely
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com