Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Many eCpG-transcript pairs are consistent between studies and ~ 90% of neighboring eCpGs associate with the same gene, within studies.
However, no consistent results were found between studies and no biomechanical risk patterns were apparent.
Inconsistent results were found between studies and within analyzed patient cohorts, likely because of methodological shortcomings.
The successful detection of mineralized cell biomarkers with SOLID-Chips varies between studies and seems to depend on overall experimental conditions.
However, obtained estimation accuracies vary between studies and only few studies are available that deal with C and N fractions.
However, the predictive value of early improvement varies between studies, and the use of different antidepressants may explain heterogeneous results.
However, comparisons must be made with caution due to methodological variations between studies and gaps in the literature.
Multiple classification systems for ecosystem services (ES) make comparison and integration between studies and assessments very difficult.
A systematic review of reviews can explain inconsistencies between studies and provide a clearer understanding of the effects of interventions.
We also provide a comparison between studies and a discussion about the potential avenues for future research.
However, the dependency varies between studies and one single relationship cannot be established between corrosion rate and resistivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com