Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The second research question (RQ2) focused on whether there is a correlation between students with higher MSE and knowledge of STEM career requirements.
Similar(59)
Notwithstanding, no significant differences in artistic production were observed between students with high in comparison to low creative imagination.
Through the examination of the behavioral patterns and differences between students with high- and low-quality discussions, it may be possible to understand the limitations of knowledge construction in synchronous discussions.
Within the context of the intervention that we focused on, it was not possible to distinguish between students with high and low prior knowledge.
There was a significant difference between students with high scores in theatre, debate and vocal music areas, grouped together as verbal performance, and students scoring zero in these areas.
To see whether there was a difference in intervention effect between students with a high and low risk score, we added the sexual behavior risk index score to the model and performed additional analyses with interactions between intervention group and sexual risk index.
Among boys, the difference in absolute underestimation of overweight prevalence between students with low and high BMI response capability was 0.58 percentage points being highest among boys with high response capability.
Comparisons were made between college students with high school and vocational high school backgrounds.
There was a significant correlation between academic achievement and nightmares (r = 0.1, p = 0.024), where students with higher nightmare frequency have low academic achievement.
Students with higher aptitude scored higher on all assessments.
The question's discrimination index measures how well the question could discriminate between high ability (students with high scores) and low ability students (students with low scores) (Ding and Beichner 2009; Doran 1980; Cohen et al. 2013).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com