Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Energy recovery and collision fraction are used as estimators of mechanical efficiency of brachiation and, remarkably, these parameters do not differ between strides with different transition types.
ER and CF do not differ significantly between strides with different transition types (p = 0.13 and p = 0.18, respectively) (Fig. 5).
Since no difference in CF between strides with different transition types is found, it seems that the trailing elbow flexion (during point and loop transitions) and the decreasing of the shoulder angle (in pendular and loop transitions) are factors that further help in avoiding the collisional losses of grabbing the next handhold with a less ideal angle.
Percentage of double hand contact differs (p = 0.0001) between strides with different transition types, more specifically between the pendular and loop transition on the one hand and point and parabolic transition on the other (p≤0.03) (Fig. 7).
When studying Figs 3 and 4, velocities, joint angles and reaction force profiles are very similar between strides with different transition types, at least during the swing phases (single contact).
Similar(55)
ER and CF do not differ between the strides with different transition types.
Fourth hypothesis: Locomotion speed will differ between the strides with different transition types.
Both measures used (ER and CF) show no difference between the strides with different transition types, regardless of the very different bCOM patterns involved.
While different step-to-step transitions are used at different speeds and a higher speed may induce a lower ER (Michilsens et al., 2011), interestingly, no difference is found in efficiency between the brachiation strides with different transition types.
The difference in ER and CF between the brachiation strides with different transition types will be determined to evaluate if certain transition types imply a more efficient use of the external work.
The second hypothesis, i.e. that brachiation strides with different step-to-step transitions differ in efficiency, is refuted.
Related(20)
between measures with different
between measurements with different
between regions with different
between patients with different
between treatments with different
between personnel with different
between children with different
between teachers with different
between compounds with different
between appointments with different
between applicants with different
between contributors with different
between cows with different
between people with different
between parties with different
between locations with different
between stars with different
between cases with different
between subjects with different
between hospitalists with different
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com