Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
There were differences in the risk of early revision between stem and cup types at implementation.
In addition, our analysis indicates that there are differences in the risk of early revision between stem and cup models not previously used in a hospital.
Similar(58)
At the last follow-up, five stems and 54 cups had been revised, corresponding to stem and cup survival rates of 92% ± 3% and 45% ± 5% at 26 years.
In Sweden, total revisions of both stem and cup were as common as cup revisions only.
A stem is not necessarily used together with a specific cup, and there are numerous stem and cup combinations (pairs), which complicates the analyses.
In 16 of these cases the cup, in 6 cases the stem, and in 1 case both stem and cup were loose.
This was done separately for each hospital, and for different types of stem and cup components.
Stem and cup were cemented with Palacos with gentamicin (Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) in all cases.
These components were used in 467 different combinations, i.e. different stem and cup pairs.
The survival rate at 25 years, both for stem and cup, was 83%.
In order to investigate whether the type of stem fixation affected cup survival when both stem and cup were exchanged at the index revision, we performed a separate analysis including this variable (cemented or uncemented stem fixation) as a covariate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com