Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(2)
Results: We did not detect statistically significant differences between specific risk groups.
We examined whether there were any differences in the rate of HPV DNA positivity after LLETZ between specific risk groups, such as patients with primary (i.e. before surgical treatment) high-risk HPV infection, CIN of different grades, and positive margins.
Similar(58)
To examine the agreement between predicted and observed risk by specific risk groups, we combined the development and validation data and applied the model in the combined data.
Further research into specific risk groups is required.
Implications for future studies in specific risk groups are discussed.
The greatest number of specific risk group-related miRNA changes was observed in ALL patients.
BRAF-V600E expression in tissue DCs did not define specific clinical risk groups but was associated with increased risk of recurrence.
However, these explanations are unlikely to explain the statistically significant differences in infectious episode rates between HLA-DR-DQ groups as parents were not told of their child's specific HLA risk group.
Survival curves of initial GS could not distinguish between moderate- and high-risk groups, although reassigned GS curves showed statistically significant differences between all risk groups.
There were no significant differences between the risk groups.
Originally, these scales were used to differentiate between groups with specific risk profiles as a reference for community prevention planning.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com