Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Significant differences between sires were noted on days 2 (P=0.044) and 4 (P=0.013), corresponding to the second and third time animals were measured in the RC.
Similar(59)
No significant variance between sires was found in PredPtY or PMC, but lots within sires was a significant variance source for both.
This implies that most of the variation between sires is accounted for by line differences.
Significant sire variation, over and above the effect of LW, was noted in %FE for RC tests 2 and 4 days after the initial RC test.
It should be noted that CIST1 also showed high concordance between the polymorphism and the segregation status of sires for the QTL.
Furthermore, for r GEBV between 0.425 and 0.45, bull sires were selected from cow sires on the basis of an additional PPT stage.
Re-rankings of sires were observed between heavy-tailed and normal models.
One explanation is that more and more genomically selected sires were used to produce animals born between 2010 and 2013.
The cows and sires were genotyped for 27 microsatellites with average spacing between markers of 4.9 cM.
Bivariate sire models with relationships among sires were used to estimate parameters.
The reliabilities of sires were 0.07 to 0.09 points higher with an animal model than with a sire model, although they increased only between 0.01 and 0.03 points if the pedigree is not taken into account in the sire model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com