Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
The quantitative comparison between samples was made using CPMG.
Similar(59)
Comparisons between samples were made after normalization with U6 RNA levels.
From these results, an interpretation of the differences in soot oxidation between both soot samples was made based on the different length scales, from the carbon fringes to the particulate filter.
According to the given RINs (RNA integrity number) a pairwise comparison between Fat and Lean line RNA samples was made in order to couple samples with least quality divergence.
Comparisons between these samples were made for the total scores of the WHODASII, MIDAS and PHQ9.
When appropriate, comparisons between two samples were made by Student's t-test or for multiple samples with analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test for assessing individual differences.
Comparisons of transcript levels between the three samples were made using nonparametric tests.
After testing molar concentrations between 0.001 0.5 M, most samples were made using 0.005 M and 0.01 M solutions, as this molar range was found to provide the most uniform and reproducible layers of rods.
Comparisons between control and treated samples were made with a paired Student's t-test.
Comparisons between two groups of independent samples were made with two-tailed, unpaired t tests.
Comparisons between mutant and wild-type control samples were made for fold change estimation using the comparative Ct method, 2−ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt = ΔCttest gene-ΔCtβ-actin, relative expression was calculated per 1000 molecules of β-actin, 1000/2-ΔΔCt.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com