However, even though potentially the most variable loci were selected, no genetic variability between studied DNA samples was found, except for one nucleotide substitution in two of them.
No significant difference between ALL and AML samples was found in the PCNA expression.
No significant difference in [U] between filtered and unfiltered samples was found (SI Figure S3), similar to a prior study.
In addition, the strength difference between the laboratory and site samples was found to be approximately 19%, and thus, it should be considered for mixing design.
After measuring two plasma samples with low and two with high TIMP-1, a joint linear range for both low and high expressing samples was found between the 1 10 and 1 100 dilutions.
The difference in scores between ER-positive and ER-negative samples was found to be statistically significant for all categories of P-value cut-offs in the Finnish target case-only samples, with the exception of the most associated SNPs.
Despite higher levels of EZH2 and lower levels of RUNX3 in CRC specimens in general, no inverse correlation between EZH2 and RUNX3 in paired samples was found arguing against a major role for histone methylation in silencing RUNX3 in CRC.
The crucial physical difference between two samples is found from the optical bandgap value.
The most significant differences between the samples were found for roughness and for the descriptors, reliable, natural and solid.
No significant differences between both samples were found in practical reasoning, general verbal abstraction, spatial-figural functioning, speed of cognitive processing.
