Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The present study is the first to compare the results for LINE-1 methylation between samples prepared with and without microdissection.
Similar(59)
No difference in yield was observed between the samples prepared with the ENZO and Epicentre T7 polymerases.
Density values in the range 3.0 3.7 g/cm3 were obtained for most of the samples prepared with deposition rates between 0.5 and 1.1 μm/h, although higher density values were obtained for higher Ti deposition rates, with maximum of approximately 4.7 g/cm3 for the case of samples with low Si content.
Generally, the BPS-32 samples prepared with different processing histories followed a trade-off between water/salt permeability selectivity and water permeability.
The samples prepared with Na4P2O7 had higher water retention capacity than the sample prepared with H3PO4.
Among the samples prepared with SPS, the sample prepared at 1200 °C exhibits a slightly larger Seebeck coefficient than that of the sample prepared at 900 °C.
Oxygen diffusion coefficients of samples prepared with different asphalt mixture designs and air void contents were determined, and correlations between the diffusion coefficients and samples' volumetric characteristics were examined.
The samples prepared with Na4P2O7 had higher water retention than the other samples.
Among the samples prepared with SPS, although the sample prepared at 900 °C shows finer particles (larger amount of grain boundaries) compared with the sample prepared at 1200 °C, the resistivities of both samples are almost the same above 523 K.
The kinetic miscibility of the samples prepared with the laboratory scale extruder was slightly higher than the samples prepared with the pilot scale extruder.
The PSi samples showed intense near-infrared PL spectra under UV excitation; all samples have a Gaussian-like shape with the maximum peak located between 743 and 966 nm, depending on the sample, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 PL spectra of the PSi samples prepared with different etching current densities.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com