Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Comparisons between sample subgroups were made with Pearson χ tests and Fisher's exact tests.
Similar(59)
Subgroup analyses, in which the strength or effect size of the association is compared between sample subgroups, have substantially less power to detect an association than the original intact sample, increasing the risk of false negative results.
The differences between all the AUCs across overall sample and subgroups were nonsignificant in nature, indicating relative stability over 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups.
The differences in distributions of categorical data between independent subgroups were analysed with Fischer's exact test due to the small sample sizes of subgroups.
Differences in mean scores for each statement between subgroups were assessed using independent-samples t-tests [ 20].
Methylation differences between tumor and normal samples and tumor subgroups were analyzed using a linear model in limma v3.2.1 [ 32].
One-sample Student t tests were used for testing whether differences between subgroups were significantly different from zero.
The differences in distributions of findings between subgroups were analysed with Fischer's exact test for categorical data due to the small sample sizes of subgroups.
No differences between subgroups were identified.
No large differences between subgroups were observed.
Furthermore, variations between subgroups were observed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com