Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The absence of a statistically significant association between reporting quality and funding source and between reporting quality and trial outcome persisted when individual components of the Jadad scale (i.e., blinding, randomization, and description of withdrawals/drop-outs) were examined.
The Delphi distinguished between reporting quality and methodological quality, because while reporting quality is particularly important for transparency, methodological quality is helpful in appraising and understanding the sources and magnitude of bias in a study [ 9].
Similar(58)
We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated.
The review is organized around three broad themes, namely, the association between financial reporting quality and CEO/CFO turnover, the effect of managerial overconfidence on financial reporting outcomes, and finally the effect of CEO/CFO gender on reporting outcomes.
We explored the association between the methodological reporting quality and center and funding source.
Completion rates of full-time externally funded (74%) and self-funded (87%) students did not differ significantly and there was no significant association between reported quality of supervision and completion of the research report.
The risk of bias domains were poorly reported and discrepancies may exist between the reported quality and what actually occurred.
Assessing 10 articles in each of five journals does not allow a reliable comparison between the reporting quality of journals.
I use the opportunity of commenting on Cassell, Myers, and Seidel (CMS) to discuss the broader issue of the relation between disclosure quality and reporting quality.
It is important to note the difference between methodological quality and reporting quality.
The aims of this report were to: 1) review the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding CR in schizophrenia; 2) conduct a systematic methodological appraisal of published reports examining the benefits of this intervention on core outcome domains; and 3) compare the correspondence between methodological and reporting quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com