Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The interaction between presentation condition and information type approached significance, F (2, 478) = 2.71, p = .067.067
For younger adults, the interaction between presentation condition and information type was not significant, F (2, 283) = 2.18, p = .11.11
However, for older adults the interaction between presentation condition and information type was significant, F (2, 193) = 3.49, p = .032.032
There was a significant interaction between presentation condition and information type, F (4, 765) = 6.86, p < .001.001
There was a significant interaction between presentation condition and information type, F (4, 622) = 3.10, p = .015, that we investigated separately for each information type, as in experiment 1.
Similar(55)
There was a three-way interaction between group, presentation condition, and information type, F (2, 478) = 3.25, p = .039 that we examined separately by group.
Fig. 5 Experiment 2: recognition accuracy (+/-SE) by presentation condition and group.
We followed up this effect separately for each information type, and only boundary information was recalled differently between presentation conditions, F (2, 190) = 14.03, p < .001.001
The interaction was driven by the differential recall of boundary information between presentation conditions, F (2, 154) = 8.69, p < .001, relative to the recall of midpoint, F (2, 154) = 2.97, p = .054, and uncued information, F (2, 154) = 0.16, p = .86.86
Moreover, these results could not be attributed to differences in memory load between presentation conditions (Experiment 3).
Additionally, within the negative condition, although there was no significant difference between presentation conditions at pre-training, t < 1, participants in the spoken group were more likely to endorse negative interpretations than did participants in the written group at posttraining, t 39) = 3.80, p <.001 (see Figure 2).
Related(20)
between presentation diagnosis and
between presentation behaviour and
between stress condition and
between health condition and
between lung condition and
between treatment condition and
between seal condition and
between presentation format and
between study condition and
between birth condition and
between feedback condition and
between record condition and
between presentation modality and
between range condition and
between gum condition and
between message condition and
between housing condition and
between presentation type and
between story condition and
between body condition and
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com