Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Nagelkerke's R2 of.585 indicated a moderately relationship between prediction and grouping.
Nagelkerke's R2 of.375 implies that the model explained 37.5% of the relationship between prediction and grouping.
Nagelkerke's R2 of.379 indicated a relatively good relationship between prediction and grouping.
Nagelkerke's (R 2 of.092) indicated a weak relationship between prediction and grouping.
Nagelkerke's R of 0.12 and Cox & Snell R of 0.08 indicated an adequate relationship between prediction and grouping.
Similar(55)
The Nagelkerke's R of 0.099 showed a weak relationship between the prediction and the grouping.
The post-test questions that tested cognitive achievement may not have been challenging enough to capture the difference in conceptual and procedural understanding between the "Prediction" and "Viewing" groups.
The analysis of the Mann-Whitney U test for both the rate of problem solving and average post-test score did not yield any statistically significant difference between the "Prediction" and "Viewing" groups (Table 4).
This was probably because trained students in the "Viewing" group could not isolate out the difference in learning effectiveness and satisfaction of a passive strategy like simply watching the PV in a one-off class resulting in no significant difference in student perception between the "Prediction" and "Viewing" groups.
In fact, the crucial learning step for NewCo is analyzing disparities between predictions and outcomes.
This leads to apples-and-oranges comparisons between predictions and reality, Risbey and Lewandowsky said.
More suggestions(12)
between composition and grouping
between prediction and soil
between prediction and target
between prediction and reality
between prediction and reference
between prediction and outcome
between prediction and prediction
between prediction and accommodation
between congruency and grouping
between prediction and observation
between prediction and experiment
between prediction and measurement
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com