Sentence examples for between predicates and properties from inspiring English sources

As Robert Kraut describes it, "metaphysical claims that initially appear to state language-world connections claims about the relation between predicates and properties, for example—are, on Sellars's theory, construed as normative claims about appropriate linguistic usage" (Kraut 2010: 601).

Each expression comprises two sets of relations between predicates and objects respectively.

We follow standard terminology in using the word 'express' to pick out the relation between a predicate and the property which is its sense or semantic content.

These reasons are also fleshed out into a fundamental position, initially strongly advocated by Dignāga, that subject-predicate differences in language do not mirror a corresponding difference between substances and properties in reality (see section 2.2).

In first-order languages, properties are represented by predicates, and having a property is represented semantically by being in the extension of a predicate.

Finally, more sophisticated forms of reductionist naturalism hold that while moral predicates do refer to natural properties, they do not so refer in virtue of any sort of analytic equivalence between moral predicates and non-moral predicates.

However, McGee (1991) and Tappenden (1993) proposed a unified treatment of the liar and sorites paradoxes based on similarities between vague predicates and the truth predicate.

We also carefully analyse the relationship between predicate encryption and searchable encryption.

It is generated from particulars and properties by predicating the latter of the former.

In response, one can try to break the link between the relevant predicates and tropes.

It also ensures the traceability between the Prolog predicates and the analyzed star schema.