Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
STRUCTURE-based analyses identified mink populations in the west and east of Scotland as belonging to different genetic clusters and variation in gene flow between populations was found within and between these clusters.
Both heritable and plastic variation within and between populations was found to be higher for abdominal vertebrae [ 47- 49].
Similar(58)
Differences between populations were found in all the species tested.
Large variations between populations were found for lung, UADT and stomach cancers even though higher mortality rates among less-educated men were found in all populations.
Fertilization rate in laboratory-raised embryos was high across all populations (Table 1), and no significant differences between populations were found.
In the AFR dataset, 33.4 % of the pairwise genetic distances between populations were found to be significant at the 5 % level.
The level of genetic differentiation (Fst) between populations is found to be a useful predictor of the performance of assignment methods [ 55].
High levels of polymorphic loci (P), expected heterozygosity (He), and Shannon's information index (Table 5) with high genetic distance values between populations were found (Table 6).
Significant differences between populations were found in plant height, main stem diameter, beginning of canopy, leaf area, leaf average and maximum width, stems and roots dry weights.
Using the set of genome-wide AIMs, mean allele frequency difference (delta) between parental populations was found to be 74%, extending from 55% to 96% (Table S2).
> -wrap-foot> Tukey's post-hoc test [Additional Information File 1] showed that the highest number of statistically significant differences between the populations was found for the ratio of cone diameter/seed width (CD/SW), the ratio of cone diameter/number of cone scale rows (CD/CSR) and cone diameter (CD) and cone length (CL).
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com